RE: “MULTIVARIABLE MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION: THE USE OF PLEIOTROPIC GENETIC VARIANTS TO ESTIMATE CAUSAL EFFECTS” In the manuscript “Multivariable Mendelian Randomiza- tion: the Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate

نویسندگان

  • Stephen Burgess
  • Frank Dudbridge
چکیده

In the manuscript “Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: the Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate Causal Effects” (1), we commented on an analysis method recently used in the literature (2), which we referred to as a “regression-based method.” We presented simulation results showing that the method had some weaknesses—in particular, not estimating the same parameter as that from a 2-stage least-squares analysis of individual-level data, and giving widely varying results when there were causal effects between the risk factors. A specific criticism of the method is that the uncertainty in the summarized associations (beta coefficients) used in the method is ignored. We recently noticed a simple modification which can be made to the regression-based method that results in estimates which closely approximate those from a 2-stage least-squares analysis and remain stablewhen there are causal effects between the risk factors. In this letter, we describe this modification of the regression-based method (we refer to the modified method as a “weighted regression-based method”) and repeat the simulations from the main paper using this modified method. We assume that data are available on the associations of J uncorrelated genetic variants with each ofK risk factors, such that the association estimate of variant j with risk factor k is Xkj, with standard error σXkj, and the association estimate of variant j with the outcome is Yj, with standard error σYj. This notation matches that of our original article (1). Theweighted regressionbased method is performed by regression of the association estimatesYjon each of theXkj in amultivariableweighted regressionmodel, using the σ 2 Yj as weights (inverse-varianceweights) (3). The regression model should have no intercept. When there is only 1 risk factor, the estimate from theweighted regression-based method is P j XjYjσ 2 Yj = P j X 2 j σ 2 Yj ;

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: The Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate Causal Effects

A conventional Mendelian randomization analysis assesses the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome by using genetic variants that are solely associated with the risk factor of interest as instrumental variables. However, in some cases, such as the case of triglyceride level as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, it may be difficult to find a relevant genetic variant that is not als...

متن کامل

Extending the MR‐Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy

Methods have been developed for Mendelian randomization that can obtain consistent causal estimates while relaxing the instrumental variable assumptions. These include multivariable Mendelian randomization, in which a genetic variant may be associated with multiple risk factors so long as any association with the outcome is via the measured risk factors (measured pleiotropy), and the MR-Egger (...

متن کامل

Using Multivariable Mendelian Randomization to Disentangle the Causal Effects of Lipid Fractions

BACKGROUND Previous Mendelian randomization studies have suggested that, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and triglycerides are causally implicated in coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) may not be, with causal effect estimates compatible with the null. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The causal effects of these three lipid fractions can be bet...

متن کامل

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression

BACKGROUND The number of Mendelian randomization analyses including large numbers of genetic variants is rapidly increasing. This is due to the proliferation of genome-wide association studies, and the desire to obtain more precise estimates of causal effects. However, some genetic variants may not be valid instrumental variables, in particular due to them having more than one proximal phenotyp...

متن کامل

Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.

Background The potential of Mendelian randomization studies is rapidly expanding due to: (i) the growing power of genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses to detect genetic variants associated with several exposures; and (ii) the increasing availability of these genetic variants in large-scale surveys. However, without a proper biological understanding of the pleiotropic working of ge...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015